Answer: A. More than six (polyarch) xylem bundles and a large, well-developed pith are the monocot root's signature — the dicot root instead has only two to four xylem patches and a small, inconspicuous pith. Monocot roots also never develop the vascular cambium ring that dicot roots form (from the pericycle) for secondary growth, so this root, being monocot, cannot undergo secondary growth at all (NCERT Class 11 Biology, Chapter 6, page 74).
Why B is wrong: B swaps the pith rule: a large, well-developed pith is the MONOCOT root feature, not dicot — dicot root pith is small or inconspicuous. Root also lacks a pericycle-driven cambium ring, so it can never gain secondary growth (trap: reading pith size backwards).
Why C is wrong: C is wrong because monocot roots are described as never undergoing secondary growth at all — there is no later stage where a monocot root spontaneously forms a cambium ring (trap: assuming every root eventually behaves like a dicot).
Why D is wrong: D is wrong on the count: 10 xylem bundles is polyarch (monocot), not the two-to-four patches of a dicot root; and a monocot root's missing cambium ring means secondary growth never starts, not that it already finished (trap: misreading polyarch as dicot and 'no cambium' as 'growth completed').