The trap that costs marks here: you see "NaCl solution" in the stem, calculate ΔT_f perfectly — and forget to multiply by the Van't Hoff factor i. That single omission flips your answer to a distractor. Ionic solutes dissociate; non-electrolyte formulas don't account for the extra particles.
What colligative properties actually are. Four solution properties depend only on the number of solute particles, not their identity: relative lowering of vapour pressure, boiling-point elevation, freezing-point depression, and osmotic pressure (NCERT Class 12 Chemistry Chapter 1, page 14). "Colligative" literally means "depending on collection" — count particles, not chemical nature.
The four formulas and when each fires.
- Relative lowering of VP: (p° − p)/p° = x_solute. Needs mole fraction — never mass fraction.
- Boiling-point elevation: ΔT_b = K_b · m. K_b is solvent-specific (water: 0.52 K·kg/mol).
- Freezing-point depression: ΔT_f = K_f · m. K_f for water: 1.86 K·kg/mol.
- Osmotic pressure: π = CRT. Uses molarity, not molality. Preferred for biomolecules (high M, tiny ΔT).
All four use molality or mole fraction — temperature-independent concentration units (except osmotic pressure, which uses molarity).
The Van't Hoff correction. For electrolytes, multiply every colligative formula by i. NaCl → Na⁺ + Cl⁻, so i ≈ 2. CaCl₂ → Ca²⁺ + 2Cl⁻, so i ≈ 3. K₂SO₄ → 2K⁺ + SO₄²⁻, so i ≈ 3. Forgetting i is the single highest-frequency error in this topic.
The mole-fraction trap. Raoult's law requires mole fractions. When a problem gives you masses of two liquids, you must convert to moles first. Substituting mass fraction directly produces a distractor — and NTA knows this.
Watch-out: if the stem says "0.1 m NaCl," your effective molality is 0.1 × 2 = 0.2 m for colligative calculations.