Solubility product
For sparingly soluble salt M_aX_b ⇌ aM⁺ + bX⁻: K_sp = [M⁺]^a[X⁻]^b. Q < K_sp: more dissolves. Q > K_sp: precipitates. Q = K_sp: saturated.
-- NCERT Class 11 Chemistry, Ch. 6, p. 205The trap that costs marks in Ksp problems is almost always the same: forgetting stoichiometric powers. For a salt like CaF₂, students write Ksp = [Ca²⁺][F⁻] instead of Ksp = [Ca²⁺][F⁻]². That single missing exponent turns every downstream calculation wrong and hands away 4 marks under negative marking.
What Ksp actually is. When a sparingly soluble salt MₐXᵦ is placed in water, a tiny amount dissolves and establishes an equilibrium:
MₐXᵦ(s) ⇌ aM⁺(aq) + bX⁻(aq)
The solubility product is the equilibrium constant for this process (NCERT Class 11 Chemistry Chapter 6, page 205):
Ksp = [M⁺]ᵃ · [X⁻]ᵇ
The solid does not appear — its activity is 1 by convention.
Connecting solubility (s) to Ksp. If the molar solubility is s, then [M⁺] = as and [X⁻] = bs. For a 1:1 salt like AgCl: Ksp = s². For a 1:2 salt like CaF₂: Ksp = (s)(2s)² = 4s³. For a 2:1 salt like Ag₂CrO₄: Ksp = (2s)²(s) = 4s³. The stoichiometry changes the algebraic form entirely.
Predicting precipitation. Compare the ionic product Q with Ksp:
Common-ion effect. Adding a common ion (say, F⁻ from NaF to a saturated CaF₂ solution) increases [F⁻], pushing Q above Ksp. The system responds by precipitating CaF₂ until Q falls back to Ksp. This lowers the effective solubility of the salt.
Watch out: when a problem gives you a non-1:1 salt and asks for solubility, write the dissolution equation first, assign stoichiometric coefficients to s, then build the Ksp expression. Skipping this step is how the stoichiometric-power trap catches you.
Select an option to see the explanation. Wrong answers show why your choice was tempting — and name the exact trap it exploits.
The solubility product expression for Mg(OH)₂ is:
Answer: B. Mg(OH)₂ ⇌ Mg²⁺ + 2OH⁻. The stoichiometric coefficient of OH⁻ is 2, so Ksp = [Mg²⁺]¹[OH⁻]² (NCERT Class 11 Chemistry Chapter 6, page 205).
Why A is wrong: A omits the stoichiometric power on [OH⁻]. Mg(OH)₂ produces 2 OH⁻ ions per formula unit, so [OH⁻] must be raised to the power 2 (trap: Ksp stoichiometric powers).
Why C is wrong: C raises [Mg²⁺] to power 2 instead of [OH⁻]. Only one Mg²⁺ ion is produced per formula unit; the exponent 2 belongs on [OH⁻].
Why D is wrong: D squares both ion concentrations. Only the ion with coefficient 2 (OH⁻) gets squared; Mg²⁺ has coefficient 1.
The Ksp of AgCl is 1.8 × 10⁻¹⁰. What is the molar solubility of AgCl in pure water?
Answer: A. AgCl ⇌ Ag⁺ + Cl⁻ (1:1 salt). Ksp = s². So s = √(1.8 × 10⁻¹⁰) = √(18 × 10⁻¹¹) ≈ 1.34 × 10⁻⁵ mol/L.
Why B is wrong: B confuses Ksp with solubility directly. For AgCl, Ksp = s², so s = √Ksp, not Ksp itself (trap: forgetting the square-root step).
Why C is wrong: C divides Ksp by 2 instead of taking the square root. The 1:1 stoichiometry means Ksp = s², requiring a square root — not division.
Why D is wrong: D uses s = Ksp/10⁻⁵ or a miscalculation. The correct operation is s = √(1.8 × 10⁻¹⁰) ≈ 1.34 × 10⁻⁵.
For CaF₂ (Ksp = 3.2 × 10⁻¹¹), the molar solubility in pure water is closest to:
Answer: C. C is correct. CaF₂ ⇌ Ca²⁺ + 2F⁻, so if s mol/L dissolves, [Ca²⁺] = s and [F⁻] = 2s. Ksp = s(2s)² = 4s³, so s = ∛(Ksp/4) = ∛(3.2 × 10⁻¹¹ / 4) = ∛(8.0 × 10⁻¹²) = 2.0 × 10⁻⁴ mol/L.
Why A is wrong: A is wrong because 5.66 × 10⁻⁶ mol/L is √Ksp — treating CaF₂ as a 1 : 1 salt with Ksp = s². CaF₂ releases two fluoride ions per formula unit, so Ksp = 4s³. (trap: Ksp stoichiometric powers)
Why B is wrong: B is wrong because 3.2 × 10⁻¹¹ mol/L is Ksp itself, reported as the solubility. Ksp is a product of ion concentrations raised to powers; the solubility has to be extracted from it through 4s³.
Why D is wrong: D is wrong because 1.6 × 10⁻⁴ mol/L comes from cubing the 2 instead of squaring it: writing (2s)³ = 8s³ and taking ∛(Ksp/8). Only the fluoride concentration is squared, because the 2 in 2F⁻ is its coefficient in the equilibrium; calcium enters to the first power.
What is the SI unit of Ksp for a salt of type AB₂ (e.g., CaF₂)?
Answer: D. For AB₂: Ksp = [A²⁺][B⁻]². Dimensions: (mol/L)(mol/L)² = mol³/L³. Equilibrium constants involving concentrations carry units.
Why A is wrong: A gives mol²/L², which would apply to a 1:1 salt (Ksp = [A⁺][B⁻] = (mol/L)²). AB₂ has three concentration factors, not two.
Why B is wrong: B gives mol/L, which is the unit of solubility (s), not of Ksp. The product of three concentration terms cannot reduce to mol/L.
Why C is wrong: C claims Ksp is dimensionless. Only the thermodynamic equilibrium constant (written in terms of activities) is dimensionless. Ksp expressed in molar concentrations carries units.
If the ionic product Q for PbCl₂ in a solution is 2.5 × 10⁻⁴ and Ksp of PbCl₂ is 1.7 × 10⁻⁵, what will happen?
Answer: C. Q (2.5 × 10⁻⁴) > Ksp (1.7 × 10⁻⁵). When Q > Ksp, the solution is supersaturated and precipitation occurs until Q decreases to equal Ksp.
Why A is wrong: A applies when Q < Ksp (unsaturated solution). Here Q > Ksp, so the reverse is true — excess ions must leave solution as precipitate.
Why B is wrong: B applies only when Q = Ksp exactly. Q here is roughly 15 times larger than Ksp, so the solution is well beyond saturation.
Why D is wrong: D is incorrect. Q and Ksp are directly compared to predict dissolution or precipitation — this comparison is the core utility of the solubility product concept.
The solubility of Ag₂CrO₄ in pure water is s mol/L. Its Ksp expression in terms of s is:
Answer: B. Ag₂CrO₄ ⇌ 2Ag⁺ + CrO₄²⁻. [Ag⁺] = 2s, [CrO₄²⁻] = s. Ksp = (2s)²·s = 4s²·s = 4s³.
Why A is wrong: A forgets both stoichiometric factors. Writing Ksp = s·s·s = s³ ignores that [Ag⁺] = 2s, not s (trap: Ksp stoichiometric powers).
Why C is wrong: C uses (2s)·s² = 2s³, reversing which ion gets the coefficient. Ag₂CrO₄ produces 2 Ag⁺ ions — the power goes on [Ag⁺], giving (2s)², not 2s.
Why D is wrong: D is wrong: 27s³ is not the Ksp of any salt — a 1 : 3 salt such as AB₃ gives s(3s)³ = 27s⁴. For Ag₂CrO₄, (2s)²·s = 4s³.
The Ksp of BaSO₄ is 1.1 × 10⁻¹⁰. If 0.01 M Na₂SO₄ is added to a saturated BaSO₄ solution, the new solubility of BaSO₄ is approximately:
Answer: D. BaSO₄ ⇌ Ba²⁺ + SO₄²⁻. With 0.01 M SO₄²⁻ from Na₂SO₄ (common-ion effect), [SO₄²⁻] ≈ 0.01 (s is negligible compared to 0.01). Ksp = s × 0.01. s = 1.1 × 10⁻¹⁰ / 0.01 = 1.1 × 10⁻⁸ mol/L. Solubility drops dramatically due to the common ion.
Why A is wrong: A gives the solubility in pure water (s = √Ksp = √(1.1 × 10⁻¹⁰) ≈ 1.05 × 10⁻⁵), ignoring the common-ion effect entirely. Na₂SO₄ supplies extra SO₄²⁻, suppressing BaSO₄ dissolution.
Why B is wrong: B divides Ksp by 0.02 instead of 0.01, perhaps doubling the SO₄²⁻ concentration. Na₂SO₄ is fully dissociated but gives only one SO₄²⁻ per formula unit; 0.01 M Na₂SO₄ → 0.01 M SO₄²⁻.
Why C is wrong: C confuses Ksp with solubility. Ksp is 1.1 × 10⁻¹⁰, but solubility in the presence of 0.01 M SO₄²⁻ is Ksp/0.01 = 1.1 × 10⁻⁸.
For a sparingly soluble salt M₃(PO₄)₂ with molar solubility s, the Ksp expression is:
Answer: A. M₃(PO₄)₂ ⇌ 3M²⁺ + 2PO₄³⁻. [M²⁺] = 3s, [PO₄³⁻] = 2s. Ksp = (3s)³·(2s)² = 27s³ · 4s² = 108s⁵.
Why B is wrong: B uses Ksp = 3s·2s·s³ or some partial coefficient application. The correct expression requires FULL powers: (3s)³ = 27s³ and (2s)² = 4s² (trap: Ksp stoichiometric powers).
Why C is wrong: C uses 3² instead of 3³ in the coefficient: 9 × 4 = 36. The powers must match the stoichiometry, (3s)³ × (2s)² = 27 × 4 s⁵ = 108s⁵.
Why D is wrong: D uses (3s)·(2s)² · s² = 3s·4s²·s² = 12s⁵, raising [M²⁺] to power 1 instead of 3. The dissolution produces 3 M²⁺ ions, demanding the cube.
Get a structured 30-day study plan and a complete formula booklet — delivered to your inbox instantly.
Pattern: NEET pattern: solubility ksp — compute solubility from Ksp for a salt with stoichiometric coefficients > 1.
Given
Ksp of Ca₃(PO₄)₂ = 2.07 × 10⁻³³. The salt is dissolved in pure water at 25°C.
Required
Find the molar solubility (s) of Ca₃(PO₄)₂ in pure water.
Concept
For a sparingly soluble salt, the dissolution equilibrium defines Ksp. The stoichiometric coefficients become powers in the Ksp expression (NCERT Class 11 Chemistry Chapter 6, page 205).
Formula
Ca₃(PO₄)₂ ⇌ 3Ca²⁺ + 2PO₄³⁻
Ksp = [Ca²⁺]³ · [PO₄³⁻]²
If molar solubility = s: [Ca²⁺] = 3s, [PO₄³⁻] = 2s
Ksp = (3s)³(2s)² = 27s³ · 4s² = 108s⁵
Substitution
2.07 × 10⁻³³ = 108s⁵
s⁵ = 2.07 × 10⁻³³ / 108 = 1.917 × 10⁻³⁵
Calculation
s = (1.917 × 10⁻³⁵)^(1/5)
Take the fifth root: 1.917^(1/5) ≈ 1.139; (10⁻³⁵)^(1/5) = 10⁻⁷
s ≈ 1.14 × 10⁻⁷ mol/L
Note on exact constants: the coefficient 108 is an exact integer derived from stoichiometry (3³ × 2² = 108). It does not limit significant figures. The answer precision is governed by the 3 significant figures in Ksp = 2.07 × 10⁻³³.
Final answer
The molar solubility of Ca₃(PO₄)₂ in pure water is approximately 1.14 × 10⁻⁷ mol/L.
Common trap
Writing Ksp = s·s = s² (treating the salt as 1:1) or Ksp = 3s·2s = 6s² (using coefficients as multipliers without raising to powers). The correct form demands (3s)³ and (2s)², producing 108s⁵. This is the stoichiometric-power trap that appears frequently in NEET solubility-product questions.
Similar NEET-style question
The Ksp of Ag₂CrO₄ is 1.12 × 10⁻¹². Calculate its molar solubility in pure water. *(Hint: Ag₂CrO₄ ⇌ 2Ag⁺ + CrO₄²⁻, so Ksp = 4s³.)*
---
For sparingly soluble salt M_aX_b ⇌ aM⁺ + bX⁻: K_sp = [M⁺]^a[X⁻]^b. Q < K_sp: more dissolves. Q > K_sp: precipitates. Q = K_sp: saturated.
-- NCERT Class 11 Chemistry, Ch. 6, p. 205Equilibrium constant for sparingly soluble salt. Q < K_sp: dissolves; Q > K_sp: precipitates.
| Symbol | Quantity | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| K_sp | solubility product | - |
These are the exact patterns that cause wrong answers in NEET. Each trap includes when it triggers and how to avoid it.
Category: Similar Terms
For salt M_aX_b: K_sp = [M⁺]^a [X⁻]^b. Student uses [M⁺][X⁻] regardless of stoichiometry.
K_sp problem with non-1:1 salt (e.g. CaF₂, Mg(OH)₂, Ag₂CrO₄).
Write dissolution: M_aX_b → aM + bX. Then K_sp = [M]^a · [X]^b. For CaF₂ ↔ Ca + 2F: K_sp = s · (2s)² = 4s³.
Root cause: formula misuse
For M_aX_b: K_sp = [M]^a · [X]^b. CaF₂: K_sp = s · (2s)² = 4s³.
More in Equilibrium: 6 exam traps and mistakes · 4 formulas · 3 question patterns from its other lessons.
1 question from NEET 2026. Answers verified against NTA official keys.
Recurring question shapes from past papers. Each pattern shows why wrong options look tempting.
forgets stoichiometric coefficient power
Uses [M+]^1 [X-]^1 for M(X)_2 salt
Page numbers are the ones printed in the current NCERT textbook (2023 rationalised edition), unless marked pre-2023. The books are free at ncert.nic.in.
Test yourself on this topic with real past-paper questions:
Practice this topic →