Λ°_m (molar conductivity at infinite dilution) = ν₊λ°₊ + ν₋λ°₋. Allows determination of Λ°_m for weak electrolytes from strong electrolytes.
-- NCERT Class 12 Chemistry, Ch. 2, p. 20Kohlrausch Law
Lesson
Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions states that the limiting molar conductivity (Λ°_m) of an electrolyte equals the sum of the individual contributions of its cation and anion at infinite dilution (NCERT Class 12 Chemistry Chapter 2, page 20). Each ion contributes a fixed amount — λ°₊ for the cation, λ°₋ for the anion — regardless of the other ion present.
The formula: Λ°_m = ν₊ λ°₊ + ν₋ λ°₋
where ν₊ and ν₋ are the number of moles of cation and anion per formula unit. For NaCl: ν₊ = 1, ν₋ = 1. For BaCl₂: ν₊ = 1, ν₋ = 2.
Why NEET cares: You cannot measure Λ°_m of weak electrolytes directly — their conductivity never plateaus even at extreme dilution. Kohlrausch's law lets you calculate it from strong electrolyte data. This is the single most-tested application of this topic.
The standard trick for weak electrolytes:
To find Λ°_m(CH₃COOH): Λ°_m(CH₃COONa) + Λ°_m(HCl) − Λ°_m(NaCl)
The Na⁺ and Cl⁻ contributions cancel, leaving CH₃COO⁻ + H⁺.
Common distractors in NEET MCQs on this topic:
-
Forgetting the stoichiometric coefficient (ν). For CaCl₂, students write λ°(Ca²⁺) + λ°(Cl⁻) instead of λ°(Ca²⁺) + 2λ°(Cl⁻). The factor of 2 on chloride is load-bearing.
-
Inverting the combination. When computing Λ°_m of a weak electrolyte, students add the wrong pair of strong electrolytes and fail to cancel the auxiliary ions.
-
Unit confusion with the molar conductivity formula. When computing Λ_m = 1000κ/C, students either invert the C term or drop the 1000 factor. The pattern
NEET pattern: molar conductivity problemconfirms both as common NEET distractors.
Watch-out: Kohlrausch's law applies only at infinite dilution. At finite concentration, interionic interactions make ion contributions non-additive.
Practice MCQs
Select an option to see the explanation. Wrong answers show why your choice was tempting — and name the exact trap it exploits.
Kohlrausch's law states that at infinite dilution, each ion contributes to the total molar conductivity of an electrolyte:
The limiting molar conductivity of BaCl₂ at infinite dilution is expressed as:
The primary application of Kohlrausch's law in NEET-level problems is to:
Given: Λ°_m(NaCl) = 126.4 S cm² mol⁻¹, Λ°_m(NaNO₃) = 121.6 S cm² mol⁻¹, Λ°_m(KNO₃) = 145.0 S cm² mol⁻¹. The value of Λ°_m(KCl) in S cm² mol⁻¹ is:
Given: Λ°_m(CH₃COONa) = 91.0 S cm² mol⁻¹, Λ°_m(HCl) = 426.2 S cm² mol⁻¹, Λ°_m(NaCl) = 126.4 S cm² mol⁻¹. The limiting molar conductivity of acetic acid (CH₃COOH) in S cm² mol⁻¹ is:
The specific conductance (κ) of a 0.025 M solution of an electrolyte is 1.25 × 10⁻⁴ S cm⁻¹. Its molar conductivity (Λ_m) in S cm² mol⁻¹ is:
Why can the limiting molar conductivity of acetic acid not be determined by direct measurement of conductivity at progressively lower concentrations?
Given: Λ°_m(Ba(OH)₂) = 457.6 S cm² mol⁻¹, Λ°_m(BaCl₂) = 280.0 S cm² mol⁻¹, Λ°_m(NH₄Cl) = 149.8 S cm² mol⁻¹. Using Kohlrausch's law, the value of Λ°_m(NH₄OH) in S cm² mol⁻¹ is:
Quick recall before you leave
Worked Example
Pattern: NEET pattern: molar conductivity problem — Compute Λ°_m of a weak electrolyte from strong electrolyte data via Kohlrausch's law.
- 1
Given
Λ°_m(CH₃COONa) = 91.0 S cm² mol⁻¹ Λ°_m(HCl) = 426.2 S cm² mol⁻¹ Λ°_m(NaCl) = 126.4 S cm² mol⁻¹ Find: Λ°_m(CH₃COOH)
- 2
Required
Limiting molar conductivity of acetic acid, a weak electrolyte whose Λ°_m cannot be measured directly.
- 3
Concept
Kohlrausch's law: Λ°_m = ν₊λ°₊ + ν₋λ°₋. Each ion's contribution is independent. By choosing strong electrolytes that share the target ions, auxiliary ions cancel in the sum.
- 4
Formula
Λ°_m(CH₃COOH) = Λ°_m(CH₃COONa) + Λ°_m(HCl) − Λ°_m(NaCl) **Why this works:** - CH₃COONa contributes λ°(CH₃COO⁻) + λ°(Na⁺) - HCl contributes λ°(H⁺) + λ°(Cl⁻) - NaCl contributes λ°(Na⁺) + λ°(Cl⁻) Subtracting NaCl cancels λ°(Na⁺) and λ°(Cl⁻), leaving λ°(CH₃COO⁻) + λ°(H⁺) = Λ°_m(CH₃COOH).
- 5
Substitution
Λ°_m(CH₃COOH) = 91.0 + 426.2 − 126.4
- 6
Calculation
= 517.2 − 126.4 = 390.8 S cm² mol⁻¹ All given values are exact data from conductivity tables; no sig-fig ambiguity arises.
- 7
Final answer
**Λ°_m(CH₃COOH) = 390.8 S cm² mol⁻¹**
- 8
Common trap
**Forgetting the subtraction step.** If you add all three values (91.0 + 426.2 + 126.4 = 643.6), you get a distractor that double-counts Na⁺ and Cl⁻. The cancellation method requires one subtraction. If you forget it, auxiliary ions remain and the answer is inflated by ~65%. For electrolytes with ν > 1 (e.g., Ba(OH)₂), remember to apply the stoichiometric coefficient when extracting individual λ° values.
- 9
Similar NEET-style question
Given: Λ°_m(KCl) = 149.8 S cm² mol⁻¹, Λ°_m(KNO₃) = 145.0 S cm² mol⁻¹, Λ°_m(AgNO₃) = 133.4 S cm² mol⁻¹. Find Λ°_m(AgCl). [Answer: 149.8 + 133.4 − 145.0 = 138.2 S cm² mol⁻¹] ---
Before solving, remember these
Formulas
Cell EMF
Both as reduction potentials. E°_cell > 0 → spontaneous.
| Symbol | Quantity | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| E°_cell | standard cell EMF | V |
| E°_red | reduction potential | V |
Valid when
- Standard conditions (1 M, 1 bar, 298 K)
- Both half-reactions as reductions
Faraday's law of electrolysis
Mass deposited at electrode. M = molar mass; I = current; t = time; n = electrons per ion.
| Symbol | Quantity | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| m | mass deposited | g |
| M | molar mass | g/mol |
| I | current | A |
| t | time | s |
| n | electrons per ion | - |
| F | Faraday | C/mol |
Valid when
- Steady current
- Single product
ΔG from EMF
Connection between thermodynamics and electrochemistry. F = 96485 C/mol.
| Symbol | Quantity | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| ΔG | Gibbs energy change | J |
| n | electrons transferred | - |
| F | Faraday 96485 | C/mol |
| E | cell EMF | V |
Valid when
- Single redox process
Molar conductivity
Molar conductivity from specific conductance. Increases with dilution as more ions are free.
| Symbol | Quantity | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Λ_m | molar conductivity | S cm^2/mol |
| κ | specific conductance | S/cm |
| C | molarity | mol/L |
Valid when
- Aqueous solution
- Single electrolyte
Nernst equation
Cell potential at non-standard conditions. n = electrons transferred. At equilibrium E=0, Q=K.
| Symbol | Quantity | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| E | cell potential | V |
| E° | standard | V |
| n | electrons | - |
| Q | reaction quotient | - |
Valid when
- 298 K (else use RT/F)
- Single redox process
Exam Traps & Common Mistakes
These are the exact patterns that cause wrong answers in NEET. Each trap includes when it triggers and how to avoid it.
Category: Negative Marking
Multi-step Nernst problem: identify electrons, write Q correctly, plug into 0.0591/n. Each sub-step has factor errors.
When it triggers
Cell EMF problem at non-standard conditions.
How to avoid
Step-by-step: (1) write balanced redox; (2) count n electrons; (3) compute Q from concentrations; (4) plug into Nernst. Verify by checking limits: at standard conditions Q=1, log Q=0, E=E°.
Category: Inorganic Exception
Student assumes Mn²⁺ is the product regardless of medium. Acidic: → Mn²⁺ (5e⁻). Neutral/weakly basic: → MnO₂ (3e⁻). Strongly basic: → MnO₄²⁻ (1e⁻).
When it triggers
Question gives KMnO4 oxidation in unspecified or specific medium.
How to avoid
Always check medium. In acidic: Mn(+7) → Mn(+2). In neutral: → Mn(+4) (MnO₂). In basic: → Mn(+6) (manganate). The number of electrons (n) in Nernst calculations depends accordingly.
Root cause: concept gap
Correction
n = number of electrons per ion to deposit. Cu²⁺ + 2e⁻ → Cu: n=2. Al³⁺ + 3e⁻: n=3. m = MIt/(nF).
Root cause: formula misuse
Correction
n = electrons transferred per balanced redox equation. For Cu²⁺ + 2e⁻ → Cu: n=2. For Mn(VII) → Mn(II): n=5.
Past Year Questions
17 questions from NEET 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025. Answers verified against NTA official keys.
The number of bonds, bonds and lone pair of electrons in pyridine, respectively are:
Which of the following statement is not correct about diborane?
Which one of the following polymers is prepared by addition polymerisation?
How NEET usually asks this
Recurring question shapes from past papers. Each pattern shows why wrong options look tempting.
Compute Λ_m from κ and C. Or compute Λ°_m of weak electrolyte from strong electrolyte values via Kohlrausch.
Common distractors
inverts c multiplier
Uses Λ = κC instead of κ/C
forgets 1000 factor
Drops 1000 in unit conversion
Apply Nernst equation to compute non-standard cell EMF given Q. n = electrons transferred.
Common distractors
wrong n electrons
Uses incorrect electron count from half-reactions
Sources
Test yourself on this topic with real past-paper questions:
Practice this topic →Free NEET study resources
Get a structured 30-day study plan and a complete formula booklet — delivered to your inbox instantly.