Alkane conformations
Free rotation around C-C single bond; staggered (lower energy, dihedral 60°) vs eclipsed (higher energy, dihedral 0°). Newman/sawhorse projections show this. Ethane: 12 kJ/mol energy difference.
-- NCERT, p. 6The conformation question NEET loves: which ethane conformation is most stable, and why? The topic sounds simple — rotation around a C–C single bond — but aspirants routinely confuse the two standard projection methods and misidentify the torsion-angle–energy relationship.
What conformations are. When two carbon atoms are joined by a single (sigma) bond, the groups attached to them can rotate freely around that bond axis. Each distinct spatial arrangement produced by such rotation is called a conformation (or conformer, or rotamer). Conformations are NOT different compounds — they interconvert rapidly at room temperature and cannot be isolated under normal conditions.
Two projection methods. NCERT Class 11 Chemistry Chapter 10 (Hydrocarbons) introduces two ways to visualise conformations:
Key conformations of ethane. Ethane (C₂H₆) has two extreme conformations:
Watch out: NEET questions may show a Newman or Sawhorse diagram and ask you to identify the conformation type or compare stability. The common confusion is reversing which is more stable — remember: staggered = stable, eclipsed = strained.
Select an option to see the explanation. Wrong answers show why your choice was tempting — and name the exact trap it exploits.
Which of the following statements about conformations of ethane is correct?
In a Newman projection of ethane, the front carbon is represented by:
The energy barrier to rotation about the C–C bond in ethane is approximately:
In the eclipsed conformation of ethane, the dihedral angle between adjacent C–H bonds on the two carbons is:
In a Sawhorse projection of the staggered conformation of ethane, the spatial relationship between the H atoms on the front and back carbons is best described as:
Which of the following is the reason for the instability of the eclipsed conformation of ethane?
Consider the following statements about conformational isomers: (i) They can be isolated at room temperature. (ii) They arise due to rotation about C–C single bonds. (iii) They have different structural formulae. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
When ethane is converted from its staggered conformation to its eclipsed conformation, the potential energy of the molecule:
Given
- Molecule: ethane (C₂H₆) - Rotational barrier (eclipsed vs staggered): 12.5 kJ/mol - Number of eclipsed H–H interactions in fully eclipsed ethane: 3
Required
- Identify the most stable conformation and draw its Newman projection - Calculate torsional strain energy per single eclipsed H–H interaction
Concept
In ethane, the staggered conformation (60° dihedral angle between adjacent C–H bonds) is the most stable because electron-pair repulsion between adjacent C–H bonds is minimised. The eclipsed conformation (0° dihedral) has three simultaneous H–H eclipsing interactions that collectively produce 12.5 kJ/mol of torsional strain.
Formula
Torsional strain per eclipsed interaction = Total torsional strain ÷ Number of eclipsed interactions
Substitution
Strain per interaction = 12.5 kJ/mol ÷ 3
Calculation
Strain per interaction = 4.17 kJ/mol (to 3 significant figures) **Note on exact values:** The number 3 (count of eclipsed H–H interactions) is an exact counting integer and does not limit significant figures. The precision of the answer is determined by 12.5 kJ/mol (3 significant figures).
Final answer
Each eclipsed H–H interaction in ethane contributes approximately **4.2 kJ/mol** of torsional strain energy. The most stable conformation is the **staggered** conformation (Newman projection: front carbon's three H bonds at 12, 4, and 8 o'clock positions; back carbon's three H bonds at 2, 6, and 10 o'clock positions — all bonds perfectly staggered at 60° intervals).
Common trap
Aspirants sometimes confuse staggered and eclipsed in Newman projections, particularly misreading which conformation has bonds overlapping (eclipsed) versus offset (staggered). In the eclipsed Newman projection, the front and back bonds visually overlap — if you can "see" all six bonds clearly without overlap, it is staggered.
Similar NEET-style question
"The most stable conformation of n-butane around the C2–C3 bond is the anti conformation. What is the dihedral angle between the two methyl groups in this conformation?" (Answer: 180°. Extension of the same staggered-vs-eclipsed principle to a larger alkane.) ---
Free rotation around C-C single bond; staggered (lower energy, dihedral 60°) vs eclipsed (higher energy, dihedral 0°). Newman/sawhorse projections show this. Ethane: 12 kJ/mol energy difference.
-- NCERT, p. 6Without peroxide: ionic mechanism — H goes to carbon with MORE hydrogens (carbocation stability rule). With peroxide (HBr only, Kharasch): radical mechanism — anti-Markovnikov.
| Symbol | Quantity | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| H,X | added atoms | - |
These are the exact patterns that cause wrong answers in NEET. Each trap includes when it triggers and how to avoid it.
Category: Organic Reaction Conditions
HBr addition to alkene: WITHOUT peroxide → Markovnikov (H to C with more H). WITH peroxide (Kharasch effect) → anti-Markovnikov (radical mechanism). Specific to HBr only — not HCl, HI.
Question gives HX addition to alkene with explicit peroxide condition or hints (e.g. ROOR, light).
Without peroxide: ionic mechanism, carbocation stability → Markovnikov. With peroxide: radical mechanism, radical stability → anti-Markovnikov. Effect ONLY for HBr (HCl too strong, HI too weak).
Category: Organic Reaction Conditions
Same starting materials give different products depending on solvent. Polar protic (water, alcohols): SN1/E1 favoured. Polar aprotic (DMSO, DMF): SN2 favoured. Affects substitution vs elimination.
Question contrasts product when solvent is changed; or specifies solvent type.
Polar protic stabilises carbocation → SN1/E1 (3° preferred). Polar aprotic doesn't solvate nucleophile → strong SN2 nucleophile (1°/2° preferred). Bulky base (t-BuOK) favours E2 over SN2.
Root cause: concept gap
o,p-directors (activators except halogens): -OH, -OR, -NH₂, -NHR, alkyl. m-directors (deactivators): -NO₂, -CN, -COOH, -CHO. Halogens: o,p-directors but DEACTIVATORS.
Root cause: concept gap
Without peroxide: Markovnikov (carbocation). With peroxide: anti-Markovnikov (radical) — only with HBr.
12 questions from NEET 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025. Answers verified against NTA official keys.
The stability of Cu2+ is more than Cu+ salts in aqueous solution due to
The compound which shows metamerism is :
Dihedral angle of least stable conformer of ethane is :
Recurring question shapes from past papers. Each pattern shows why wrong options look tempting.
classifies halogen as deactivating ortho para incorrectly
Misses halogens are weak deactivators but o,p-directors
ignores peroxide effect
Same product regardless of conditions
Test yourself on this topic with real past-paper questions:
Practice this topic →Get a structured 30-day study plan and a complete formula booklet — delivered to your inbox instantly.