The coefficient swap between solid and hollow bodies is a high-frequency trap in NEET rotational mechanics. If you've ever written 2/3 MR² for a solid sphere or 2/5 MR² for a hollow sphere, this lesson is your repair session.
The core table you must own:
| Geometry | Axis | I |
|---|
| Solid sphere | Diameter | (2/5)MR² |
| Hollow sphere (thin shell) | Diameter | (2/3)MR² |
| Disc / solid cylinder | Central axis (⊥ to face) | (1/2)MR² |
| Ring / hollow cylinder (thin) | Central axis (⊥ to plane) | MR² |
| Uniform rod | Centre, ⊥ to length | (1/12)ML² |
| Uniform rod | One end, ⊥ to length | (1/3)ML² |
These are NCERT-tabulated values (Class 11 Physics Chapter 6, page 10). Every formula assumes uniform mass distribution and rotation about the stated symmetry axis.
Why the coefficients differ — the physical logic: Moment of inertia measures how mass is distributed relative to the rotation axis. A solid sphere packs mass throughout its volume, including near the centre — so its MOI coefficient (2/5) is smaller than the hollow sphere's (2/3), which has all mass at the outer surface, far from the axis. Same logic: a disc (1/2) has less I than a ring (1) of equal M and R, because the disc has mass spread from centre to rim.
Shifting axes: When NEET asks for I about a non-standard axis, apply the parallel axes theorem: I = I_cm + Md² (NCERT Chapter 6, page 12). For planar bodies, the perpendicular axes theorem gives I_z = I_x + I_y (same page). Neither theorem changes the base coefficients — it adds Md² or combines two in-plane values.
Watch out: The most common distractor in NEET geometry-ratio problems swaps the solid and hollow coefficients. Before marking an answer, ask: "Is mass closer to the axis or farther?" Closer → smaller coefficient.