Energy of a satellite
Total mechanical energy E = -G M m / (2(R+h)) = -KE = U/2 (virial relations for circular orbit). Negative E means the satellite is bound; making E ≥ 0 escapes.
-- NCERT Class 11 Physics, Ch. 7, p. 14The energy of an orbiting satellite is a bound-state accounting problem — and the trap that costs marks is forgetting one side of the ledger.
The core relationship. For a satellite of mass m in a circular orbit at radius r = R + h around Earth (mass M):
The total energy is exactly −K, or equivalently U/2. This is the virial theorem result for inverse-square forces. A bound satellite always has E < 0. If energy is added until E = 0, the satellite escapes — it reaches the threshold of an unbound orbit.
The high-frequency trap. When a question asks "how much energy is needed to move a satellite from orbit 1 to orbit 2," aspirants commonly compute only the PE change (ΔU) and forget that the satellite must also change its orbital speed. The correct answer is the change in total energy: ΔE = E₂ − E₁. Since E includes both KE and PE, you cannot ignore either. Similarly, the energy to launch a satellite from rest on the surface to a circular orbit at height h is not just the PE gain — you must also supply the orbital KE.
Sign discipline. E is negative and its magnitude decreases as r increases (the satellite becomes less tightly bound at higher orbits). "More energy" means E becomes less negative — closer to zero, not more negative.
NCERT Class 11 Physics, Chapter 8 (Gravitation), page 14 derives the satellite energy formula by combining the orbital velocity condition with the PE expression.
Select an option to see the explanation. Wrong answers show why your choice was tempting — and name the exact trap it exploits.
For a satellite in a stable circular orbit around Earth, which statement about its total mechanical energy E is correct?
For a satellite in circular orbit, what is the relationship between its kinetic energy K and total mechanical energy E?
For a satellite of mass *m* in a circular orbit of radius *r* around a planet of mass *M*, the gravitational potential energy is U = −GMm/r. What is the ratio |U|/K, where K is the orbital kinetic energy?
A satellite orbits Earth in a circular orbit of radius *r*. If it is moved to a new circular orbit of radius 2*r*, what is the ratio of its new total energy E₂ to the original total energy E₁?
A satellite of mass *m* is in a circular orbit at height *h* = *R* above Earth's surface (orbit radius = 2*R*). What is its total mechanical energy? (Take *g* as surface gravitational acceleration, *R* as Earth's radius.)
A satellite is in a circular orbit with total energy E. What additional energy must be supplied to make it escape to infinity?
A satellite of mass *m* rests on Earth's surface. What minimum energy must be supplied to place it in a circular orbit at height *h* = *R* above the surface? (Neglect air resistance. Use *g* for surface gravity, *R* for Earth's radius.)
Two satellites A and B of masses *m* and 2*m* orbit Earth in circular orbits of radii 2*R* and 4*R* respectively. What is the ratio of total energy of A to that of B, i.e., E_A/E_B?
Total mechanical energy E = -G M m / (2(R+h)) = -KE = U/2 (virial relations for circular orbit). Negative E means the satellite is bound; making E ≥ 0 escapes.
-- NCERT Class 11 Physics, Ch. 7, p. 14Minimum speed for an object to escape gravity to infinity from radius R. Earth: ~11.2 km/s.
| Symbol | Quantity | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| v_e | escape velocity | m/s |
| M | planet mass | kg |
| R | planet radius | m |
| g | surface gravity | m/s^2 |
PE of two-body system; negative because gravity is attractive (work to separate them is positive).
| Symbol | Quantity | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| U | grav PE | J |
| M, m | two masses | kg |
| r | separation | m |
Gravitational acceleration decreases with altitude above Earth's surface.
| Symbol | Quantity | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| g_h | g at height h | m/s^2 |
| g | surface g | m/s^2 |
| R | Earth radius | m |
| h | altitude | m |
Inside Earth (uniform density), g decreases linearly with depth, vanishing at centre.
| Symbol | Quantity | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| g_d | g at depth | m/s^2 |
| g | surface g | m/s^2 |
| R | Earth radius | m |
| d | depth | m |
Square of orbital period proportional to cube of semi-major axis. Holds for elliptic orbits about a central mass.
| Symbol | Quantity | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| T | orbital period | s |
| a | semi-major axis | m |
| M | central mass | kg |
Speed of circular orbit at altitude h above body of mass M, radius R.
| Symbol | Quantity | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| v | orbital speed | m/s |
| M | central mass | kg |
| R+h | orbit radius | m |
Total energy = KE + PE = -KE (virial). Always negative for bound orbit; E -> 0 at infinity.
| Symbol | Quantity | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| E | total energy | J |
| M, m | central mass and satellite mass | kg |
| R+h | orbit radius | m |
Attractive force between any two masses. Inverse-square central force.
| Symbol | Quantity | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| F | force | N |
| G | grav constant = 6.674e-11 | N*m^2/kg^2 |
| m1, m2 | masses | kg |
| r | centre-to-centre distance | m |
These are the exact patterns that cause wrong answers in NEET. Each trap includes when it triggers and how to avoid it.
Category: Similar Terms
Student treats g(h) as linear in h. Actual: g(R/(R+h))² (inverse-square).
Question asks for g at significant altitude (e.g. R/2 above surface).
Use g_h = g (R/(R+h))². Linear approximation g(1 - 2h/R) only valid for h << R.
Category: Similar Terms
Student treats T proportional to a (linear) instead of a^(3/2).
Question gives change in semi-major axis and asks for new period.
T² ∝ a³, so T ∝ a^(3/2). Doubling a multiplies T by 2^(3/2) ≈ 2.83.
Root cause: formula misuse
Use g_h = g(R/(R+h))² (inverse-square). Linear approximation g(1-2h/R) is only valid for h << R. For h = R/2, the exact formula gives g_h = (2/3)² g = 4g/9, not g(1-1) = 0.
Root cause: formula misuse
T² ∝ a³, so T ∝ a^(3/2). Doubling a multiplies T by 2^(3/2) ≈ 2.83. Quadrupling a → 8× T.
forgets density not mass
Confuses planet mass with density given radius scaling
uses linear decrease with h
Treats g as linear in h instead of inverse-square
uses linear relation
Treats T proportional to a not a^(3/2)
forgets orbital KE component
Computes only PE change, ignoring orbital KE
Test yourself on this topic with real past-paper questions:
Practice this topic →Get a structured 30-day Mechanics plan and a complete formula booklet — delivered to your inbox instantly.