Answer: B. B is correct. Order is an experimental quantity, and NCERT warns that a balanced equation "never gives us a true picture of how a reaction takes place" (NCERT Class 12 Chemistry, Chapter 3, page 70). A multi-step reaction can still show exponents that happen to equal the coefficients — the slow step may simply involve those species in those numbers — so the match on its own proves nothing. The mechanism has to be established independently, by detecting intermediates or identifying the rate-determining step.
Why A is wrong: A is wrong because matching exponents can occur by coincidence in complex reactions. The rate law alone cannot confirm mechanism — independent evidence is required (trap: the exact misconception this topic targets, where students equate coefficient-matching with proof of elementary nature).
Why C is wrong: C is wrong because it inverts the rule. For a genuinely elementary step the exponents DO equal the coefficients — that is exactly what molecularity means. The flaw in the student's argument is the converse: matching exponents can ALSO arise in a complex reaction, so the match cannot single out an elementary one (trap: over-correcting a misconception into an equally false opposite).
Why D is wrong: D is wrong because trimolecular (termolecular) elementary reactions are extremely rare due to the low probability of three-body simultaneous collisions. Moreover, the coincidence of exponents matching coefficients does not establish elementary nature (trap: assuming any reaction with three reactant molecules in the balanced equation must be trimolecular and elementary).