The trap that costs marks in IUPAC nomenclature questions is numbering the parent chain from the wrong end. Under time pressure, students pick the first carbon they see and number forward — giving substituents locants like 4,5 when numbering from the other end would give 2,3. The exam does not reward partial naming; the entire name must be correct, and a wrong locant makes the entire answer wrong.
The IUPAC system in brief. NCERT Class 11 Chemistry Chapter 12 (Organic Chemistry — Some Basic Principles and Techniques) lays out a deterministic algorithm: (1) identify the longest continuous carbon chain containing the principal characteristic group — this is the parent chain; (2) number the chain so the principal characteristic group gets the lowest possible locant; (3) when no principal characteristic group is present (hydrocarbons), give the lowest set of locants to substituents; (4) name substituents alphabetically with their locants; (5) assemble: locants + substituents + parent root + suffix.
The lowest-locant rule — where mistakes happen. "Lowest set of locants" means compare the full set, not just the first locant. For 2,3,5-trimethylheptane vs. 3,5,6-trimethylheptane, compare position by position: 2 < 3 at the first point of difference, so 2,3,5 wins. Students often compare sums (2+3+5 = 10 vs. 3+5+6 = 14); while the sum shortcut sometimes gives the same answer, the IUPAC rule is first-point-of-difference comparison, not sum comparison.
Functional group priority. When a functional group suffix is present (e.g., -ol, -al, -oic acid), that group must receive the lowest locant even if it means substituents get higher locants. Students confuse this with the hydrocarbon rule and minimise substituent locants instead.
Watch out: NEET questions on nomenclature are typically recall or single-step application — but the marks are lost to careless numbering, not to conceptual difficulty.