Answer: A. For non-perpendicular resolution, the parallelogram law applies. Depending on the angle between the chosen directions, one or both components can exceed the magnitude of the original vector. This is unlike rectangular resolution where each component ≤ the original magnitude (NCERT Class 11 Physics Chapter 3, page 31 resolves a vector along any two directions; that a component can exceed the vector is not stated there).
Why B is wrong: B is wrong because the constraint |component| ≤ |F| holds only for perpendicular (rectangular) resolution. For oblique axes, the parallelogram construction can produce components larger than F. Example: resolve a vector along two directions that make a small angle with each other — both components become large.
Why C is wrong: C is wrong because there is no reason the two components must be equal. Equality occurs only in the special case where the vector bisects the angle between the two resolution directions.
Why D is wrong: D is wrong because the magnitude relation for non-perpendicular resolution follows the parallelogram law (involving the angle between component directions), not simple addition. |F₁| + |F₂| = |F| has no general validity.